Lear Corporation (LEA) by event type

LEA moves most on analyst upgrades — a median of -0.32% at 30 minutes across 24 measured events. Each row is measured over the last three years and read against the price at its own news timestamp. Back to the LEA overview →

By event type

How LEA reacts across 6 measured event types.

EventEventsMedian 30-min% positiveMedian to close
Analyst upgrades
2,198 of 2,717
24-0.32%33%-0.20%
Analyst downgrades
650 of 2,603
31+0.27%55%-0.41%
Coverage initiations
884 of 2,283
12+0.10%58%-1.01%
Rating reiterations
2,015 of 3,522
107-0.02%48%-0.10%
Price-target raises
363 of 1,790
30+0.12%60%+0.04%
Price-target cuts
855 of 1,527
43-0.03%42%+0.01%

Last 3 years, pulled 2026-09-21. Reaction = percent move vs. the price at the news timestamp. Counts and medians only. The rank under each event type orders every name measured for it by median 30-min reaction, most positive first — so a low rank on a downgrade means this name falls harder than most, not that it moves less. Names with an identical median share a rank; a name the cross-section does not carry shows no rank rather than a guessed one.

That’s how LEA usually reacts — get an email when it moves on news →
Keep exploring

Every name measured for these event types: Analyst upgrades → · Analyst downgrades → · Coverage initiations → · Rating reiterations → · Price-target raises → · Price-target cuts → · LEA overview →

Other Consumer Cyclical names, measured the same way

Same sector, same measurement: percent move vs. the price at the news timestamp, read at 30 minutes. Sample sizes differ, so the medians are comparable but the confidence behind them is not.