Sherwin-Williams Company (The) (SHW) by event type
SHW moves most on coverage initiations — a median of +0.23% at 30 minutes across 15 measured events. Each row is measured over the last three years and read against the price at its own news timestamp. Back to the SHW overview →
How SHW reacts across 6 measured event types.
| Event | Events | Median 30-min | % positive | Median to close |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst upgrades 1,751 of 2,717 | 40 | -0.10% | 43% | +0.19% |
| Analyst downgrades 1,913 of 2,603 | 39 | -0.22% | 41% | +0.09% |
| Coverage initiations 692 of 2,283 | 15 | +0.23% | 73% | +0.93% |
| Rating reiterations 1,958 of 3,522 | 129 | -0.02% | 47% | -0.19% |
| Price-target raises 472 of 1,790 | 43 | +0.09% | 65% | -0.26% |
| Price-target cuts 938 of 1,527 | 41 | -0.06% | 46% | 0.00% |
Last 3 years, pulled 2026-09-21. Reaction = percent move vs. the price at the news timestamp. Counts and medians only. The rank under each event type orders every name measured for it by median 30-min reaction, most positive first — so a low rank on a downgrade means this name falls harder than most, not that it moves less. Names with an identical median share a rank; a name the cross-section does not carry shows no rank rather than a guessed one.
That’s how SHW usually reacts — get an email when it moves on news →Every name measured for these event types: Analyst upgrades → · Analyst downgrades → · Coverage initiations → · Rating reiterations → · Price-target raises → · Price-target cuts → · SHW overview →
Other Basic Materials names, measured the same way
| Ticker | Events | Median 30-min | % positive |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ciner Resources LP Common Units representing Limited Partner Interests (CINR) | 344 | 0.00% | 45% |
| Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (LPX) | 344 | +0.04% | 52% |
| Endeavour Silver Corporation Ordinary Shares (Canada) (EXK) | 342 | -0.32% | 40% |
| PQ Group Holdings, Inc (PQG) | 341 | +0.06% | 52% |
Same sector, same measurement: percent move vs. the price at the news timestamp, read at 30 minutes. Sample sizes differ, so the medians are comparable but the confidence behind them is not.