Charles Schwab Corporation (The) (SCHW) by event type
SCHW moves most on coverage initiations — a median of +0.62% at 30 minutes across 16 measured events. Each row is measured over the last three years and read against the price at its own news timestamp. Back to the SCHW overview →
How SCHW reacts across 6 measured event types.
| Event | Events | Median 30-min | % positive | Median to close |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst upgrades 899 of 2,717 | 33 | +0.16% | 55% | -0.46% |
| Analyst downgrades 2,044 of 2,603 | 21 | -0.33% | 33% | -0.53% |
| Coverage initiations 304 of 2,283 | 16 | +0.62% | 81% | +0.12% |
| Rating reiterations 1,514 of 3,522 | 197 | +0.01% | 51% | -0.00% |
| Price-target raises 403 of 1,790 | 76 | +0.11% | 58% | +0.10% |
| Price-target cuts 803 of 1,527 | 45 | -0.02% | 44% | -0.15% |
Last 3 years, pulled 2026-09-21. Reaction = percent move vs. the price at the news timestamp. Counts and medians only. The rank under each event type orders every name measured for it by median 30-min reaction, most positive first — so a low rank on a downgrade means this name falls harder than most, not that it moves less. Names with an identical median share a rank; a name the cross-section does not carry shows no rank rather than a guessed one.
That’s how SCHW usually reacts — get an email when it moves on news →Every name measured for these event types: Analyst upgrades → · Analyst downgrades → · Coverage initiations → · Rating reiterations → · Price-target raises → · Price-target cuts → · SCHW overview →
Other Financial Services names, measured the same way
| Ticker | Events | Median 30-min | % positive |
|---|---|---|---|
| Western Alliance Bancorporation (DE) (WAL) | 714 | +0.07% | 55% |
| Focus Financial Partners Inc. (FOCS) | 708 | 0.00% | 49% |
| China Life Insurance Company Limited American Depositary Shares (LFC) | 702 | -0.04% | 44% |
| Allegiance Bancshares, Inc. (ABTX) | 700 | 0.00% | 46% |
Same sector, same measurement: percent move vs. the price at the news timestamp, read at 30 minutes. Sample sizes differ, so the medians are comparable but the confidence behind them is not.