Bank OZK (OZK) by event type
OZK moves most on analyst upgrades — a median of +0.54% at 30 minutes across 24 measured events. Each row is measured over the last three years and read against the price at its own news timestamp. Back to the OZK overview →
How OZK reacts across 6 measured event types.
| Event | Events | Median 30-min | % positive | Median to close |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst upgrades 327 of 2,717 | 24 | +0.54% | 71% | +0.17% |
| Analyst downgrades 877 of 2,603 | 26 | +0.15% | 54% | +0.33% |
| Coverage initiations 976 of 2,283 | 13 | +0.06% | 69% | +0.78% |
| Rating reiterations 2,514 of 3,522 | 65 | -0.09% | 48% | -0.16% |
| Price-target raises 1,368 of 1,790 | 15 | -0.11% | 40% | -0.43% |
| Price-target cuts 988 of 1,527 | 18 | -0.07% | 44% | -0.48% |
Last 3 years, pulled 2026-09-21. Reaction = percent move vs. the price at the news timestamp. Counts and medians only. The rank under each event type orders every name measured for it by median 30-min reaction, most positive first — so a low rank on a downgrade means this name falls harder than most, not that it moves less. Names with an identical median share a rank; a name the cross-section does not carry shows no rank rather than a guessed one.
That’s how OZK usually reacts — get an email when it moves on news →Every name measured for these event types: Analyst upgrades → · Analyst downgrades → · Coverage initiations → · Rating reiterations → · Price-target raises → · Price-target cuts → · OZK overview →
Other Financial Services names, measured the same way
| Ticker | Events | Median 30-min | % positive |
|---|---|---|---|
| White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd. (WTM) | 212 | 0.00% | 34% |
| Cushing NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund Common Shares of Beneficial Interest (SZC) | 211 | 0.00% | 46% |
| BLACKROCK MUNI INCOME INVEST (BBF) | 209 | 0.00% | 47% |
| Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. - Class A (DHIL) | 209 | -0.01% | 38% |
Same sector, same measurement: percent move vs. the price at the news timestamp, read at 30 minutes. Sample sizes differ, so the medians are comparable but the confidence behind them is not.