Nutanix, Inc. - Class A (NTNX) by event type
NTNX moves most on coverage initiations — a median of +0.68% at 30 minutes across 18 measured events. Each row is measured over the last three years and read against the price at its own news timestamp. Back to the NTNX overview →
How NTNX reacts across 6 measured event types.
| Event | Events | Median 30-min | % positive | Median to close |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst upgrades 1,082 of 2,717 | 30 | +0.09% | 53% | +0.18% |
| Analyst downgrades 1,921 of 2,603 | 33 | -0.23% | 39% | -0.55% |
| Coverage initiations 275 of 2,283 | 18 | +0.68% | 67% | +0.62% |
| Rating reiterations 2,888 of 3,522 | 146 | -0.18% | 41% | -0.34% |
| Price-target raises 697 of 1,790 | 66 | +0.04% | 50% | -0.22% |
| Price-target cuts 1,448 of 1,527 | 19 | -0.50% | 32% | -0.19% |
Last 3 years, pulled 2026-09-21. Reaction = percent move vs. the price at the news timestamp. Counts and medians only. The rank under each event type orders every name measured for it by median 30-min reaction, most positive first — so a low rank on a downgrade means this name falls harder than most, not that it moves less. Names with an identical median share a rank; a name the cross-section does not carry shows no rank rather than a guessed one.
That’s how NTNX usually reacts — get an email when it moves on news →Every name measured for these event types: Analyst upgrades → · Analyst downgrades → · Coverage initiations → · Rating reiterations → · Price-target raises → · Price-target cuts → · NTNX overview →
Other Technology names, measured the same way
| Ticker | Events | Median 30-min | % positive |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fang Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (Each representing Four Class A Ordinary Shares, HK$1.00 par value) (SFUN) | 442 | 0.00% | 48% |
| TOP IMAGE SYSTEMS (TISA) | 440 | 0.00% | 44% |
| Qorvo, Inc. (QRVO) | 435 | +0.26% | 60% |
| LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. (RAMP) | 435 | -0.13% | 41% |
Same sector, same measurement: percent move vs. the price at the news timestamp, read at 30 minutes. Sample sizes differ, so the medians are comparable but the confidence behind them is not.