Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH) by event type
MANH moves most on coverage initiations — a median of +0.61% at 30 minutes across 17 measured events. Each row is measured over the last three years and read against the price at its own news timestamp. Back to the MANH overview →
How MANH reacts across 6 measured event types.
| Event | Events | Median 30-min | % positive | Median to close |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst upgrades 2,214 of 2,717 | 19 | -0.33% | 37% | +0.37% |
| Analyst downgrades 434 of 2,603 | 11 | +0.45% | 82% | +0.41% |
| Coverage initiations 313 of 2,283 | 17 | +0.61% | 82% | +1.56% |
| Rating reiterations 1,337 of 3,522 | 80 | +0.03% | 51% | -0.42% |
| Price-target raises 1,359 of 1,790 | 29 | -0.11% | 48% | +0.12% |
| Price-target cuts 1,462 of 1,527 | 20 | -0.55% | 35% | -0.30% |
Last 3 years, pulled 2026-09-21. Reaction = percent move vs. the price at the news timestamp. Counts and medians only. The rank under each event type orders every name measured for it by median 30-min reaction, most positive first — so a low rank on a downgrade means this name falls harder than most, not that it moves less. Names with an identical median share a rank; a name the cross-section does not carry shows no rank rather than a guessed one.
That’s how MANH usually reacts — get an email when it moves on news →Every name measured for these event types: Analyst upgrades → · Analyst downgrades → · Coverage initiations → · Rating reiterations → · Price-target raises → · Price-target cuts → · MANH overview →
Other Technology names, measured the same way
| Ticker | Events | Median 30-min | % positive |
|---|---|---|---|
| Endava plc American Depositary Shares (each representing one Class A Ordinary Share) (DAVA) | 764 | -0.08% | 45% |
| EXFO Inc - Subordinate Voting Shares (EXFO) | 761 | 0.00% | 41% |
| Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) | 752 | -0.10% | 47% |
| IntriCon Corporation (IIN) | 751 | 0.00% | 45% |
Same sector, same measurement: percent move vs. the price at the news timestamp, read at 30 minutes. Sample sizes differ, so the medians are comparable but the confidence behind them is not.