Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (LPX) by event type
LPX moves most on analyst downgrades — a median of +0.58% at 30 minutes across 22 measured events. Each row is measured over the last three years and read against the price at its own news timestamp. Back to the LPX overview →
How LPX reacts across 6 measured event types.
| Event | Events | Median 30-min | % positive | Median to close |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst upgrades 1,026 of 2,717 | 22 | +0.11% | 64% | +0.31% |
| Analyst downgrades 323 of 2,603 | 22 | +0.58% | 64% | +1.20% |
| Coverage initiations 1,069 of 2,283 | 14 | +0.02% | 50% | -1.09% |
| Rating reiterations 1,039 of 3,522 | 65 | +0.07% | 59% | +0.41% |
| Price-target raises 1,257 of 1,790 | 27 | -0.08% | 41% | +0.61% |
| Price-target cuts 226 of 1,527 | 19 | +0.19% | 63% | +0.14% |
Last 3 years, pulled 2026-09-21. Reaction = percent move vs. the price at the news timestamp. Counts and medians only. The rank under each event type orders every name measured for it by median 30-min reaction, most positive first — so a low rank on a downgrade means this name falls harder than most, not that it moves less. Names with an identical median share a rank; a name the cross-section does not carry shows no rank rather than a guessed one.
That’s how LPX usually reacts — get an email when it moves on news →Every name measured for these event types: Analyst upgrades → · Analyst downgrades → · Coverage initiations → · Rating reiterations → · Price-target raises → · Price-target cuts → · LPX overview →
Other Basic Materials names, measured the same way
| Ticker | Events | Median 30-min | % positive |
|---|---|---|---|
| Comstock Inc. (LODE) | 346 | -0.94% | 38% |
| Ciner Resources LP Common Units representing Limited Partner Interests (CINR) | 344 | 0.00% | 45% |
| Sherwin-Williams Company (The) (SHW) | 344 | -0.10% | 38% |
| Endeavour Silver Corporation Ordinary Shares (Canada) (EXK) | 342 | -0.32% | 40% |
Same sector, same measurement: percent move vs. the price at the news timestamp, read at 30 minutes. Sample sizes differ, so the medians are comparable but the confidence behind them is not.