Janus Henderson Group plc Ordinary Shares (JHG) by event type
JHG moves most on coverage initiations — a median of +0.64% at 30 minutes across 12 measured events. Each row is measured over the last three years and read against the price at its own news timestamp. Back to the JHG overview →
How JHG reacts across 6 measured event types.
| Event | Events | Median 30-min | % positive | Median to close |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst upgrades 2,119 of 2,717 | 29 | -0.28% | 28% | -0.08% |
| Analyst downgrades 606 of 2,603 | 12 | +0.31% | 67% | +0.32% |
| Coverage initiations 292 of 2,283 | 12 | +0.64% | 75% | +0.07% |
| Rating reiterations 1,300 of 3,522 | 53 | +0.03% | 53% | +0.22% |
| Price-target raises 660 of 1,790 | 35 | +0.04% | 54% | +0.22% |
| Price-target cuts 174 of 1,527 | 10 | +0.23% | 60% | 0.00% |
Last 3 years, pulled 2026-09-21. Reaction = percent move vs. the price at the news timestamp. Counts and medians only. The rank under each event type orders every name measured for it by median 30-min reaction, most positive first — so a low rank on a downgrade means this name falls harder than most, not that it moves less. Names with an identical median share a rank; a name the cross-section does not carry shows no rank rather than a guessed one.
That’s how JHG usually reacts — get an email when it moves on news →Every name measured for these event types: Analyst upgrades → · Analyst downgrades → · Coverage initiations → · Rating reiterations → · Price-target raises → · Price-target cuts → · JHG overview →
Other Financial Services names, measured the same way
| Ticker | Events | Median 30-min | % positive |
|---|---|---|---|
| Toronto Dominion Bank (The) (TD) | 2,000+ | +0.01% | 51% |
| Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company - Ordinary Shares (WLTW) | 1,897 | 0.00% | 50% |
| IBERIABANK (IBKC) | 1,736 | -0.02% | 46% |
| Lloyds Banking Group Plc American Depositary Shares (LYG) | 1,713 | 0.00% | 40% |
Same sector, same measurement: percent move vs. the price at the news timestamp, read at 30 minutes. Sample sizes differ, so the medians are comparable but the confidence behind them is not.