Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) by event type

FANG moves most on analyst downgrades — a median of +0.79% at 30 minutes across 19 measured events. Each row is measured over the last three years and read against the price at its own news timestamp. Back to the FANG overview →

By event type

How FANG reacts across 6 measured event types.

EventEventsMedian 30-min% positiveMedian to close
Analyst upgrades
1,587 of 2,717
33-0.04%39%+0.47%
Analyst downgrades
192 of 2,603
19+0.79%79%+0.93%
Coverage initiations
1,100 of 2,283
35+0.01%51%+0.36%
Rating reiterations
2,069 of 3,522
227-0.03%47%0.00%
Price-target raises
411 of 1,790
78+0.11%64%-0.07%
Price-target cuts
1,002 of 1,527
61-0.08%38%+0.05%

Last 3 years, pulled 2026-09-21. Reaction = percent move vs. the price at the news timestamp. Counts and medians only. The rank under each event type orders every name measured for it by median 30-min reaction, most positive first — so a low rank on a downgrade means this name falls harder than most, not that it moves less. Names with an identical median share a rank; a name the cross-section does not carry shows no rank rather than a guessed one.

That’s how FANG usually reacts — get an email when it moves on news →
Keep exploring

Every name measured for these event types: Analyst upgrades → · Analyst downgrades → · Coverage initiations → · Rating reiterations → · Price-target raises → · Price-target cuts → · FANG overview →

Other Energy names, measured the same way

TickerEventsMedian 30-min% positive
EQT Corporation (EQT)441+0.13%55%
PBF Energy Inc. Class A (PBF)441-0.10%46%
ECLIPSE RESOURCES CORP (ECR)431-0.34%38%
Noble Corporation plc A Ordinary Shares (NE)422-0.07%48%

Same sector, same measurement: percent move vs. the price at the news timestamp, read at 30 minutes. Sample sizes differ, so the medians are comparable but the confidence behind them is not.